With insights on the inevitability of change, and the importance of finding joy in our surroundings, this episode encourages listeners to rethink their connection to the countryside. Why should those who rarely venture outdoors care about environmental issues?  Welcome to The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate podcast, where your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow are often discussing questions sent in by listeners. However in a break from the norm, and to give you an opportunity to get your question in for them to discuss, they instead are exploring one of the unused questions that was set during the Environmental Live & Unscripted (the live iteration of this podcast) that was in May 2023 in the setting of the Bothy Vineyard, Oxfordshire. The question set by Julian, a member of the audience, is as follows: “If we have effective policies that result in less meat & dairy - the Great British heritage lobby will say that we’ll be throwing away the British countryside - how it looks. How do we involve the public thinking about the future countryside that they want and also helps save the planet?” During this discussion Stuart explores the notion of maintaining protected nature reserves—should we preserve them, as they were, as they are, or as we envision them to be in the future? He emphasises the importance of a balanced approach, and the power of a strong, supported transition in environmental stewardship. William adds to the conversation by reminding us that the British landscape is largely a human creation, prompting us to consider how we might reshape it once more. As the duo navigate the challenges of changing public habits and perceptions, they delve into the deeper question of, our resistance to change. Could our reluctance to embrace new ideas be tied to our fear of mortality? Stuart and William reflect on how our life spans influence our views, and how we can cultivate a clearer vision for the future of our environment. Join us for an engaging discussion that challenges your perceptions and inspires action in these challenging times. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheelsHelp us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In this episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle a thought-provoking question from the 2023 live incarnation of this podcast, Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, which was set at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire, England. Sylvia, an audience member, raised the following question: “This is a question about diversity - human diversity - I notice all the speakers today are men and all the audience are white. How can we get the environment discussed by a wider audience?” Stuart and William dive deep into this crucial topic, exploring ways to make environmental conversations more inclusive and accessible to a wider audience. The hosts reflect on the challenges they faced in diversifying their panel and audience for the live event. They discuss the importance of bringing environmental debates to spaces where a diverse range of people and underrepresented groups feel comfortable, rather than expecting them to come to unfamiliar settings. Stuart and William examine various barriers that prevent people from attending environmental events and offer insights on how to overcome these obstacles. They emphasise their role as facilitators and the need to actively reach out to diverse communities. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In a break from our normal output, we’re tackling an unanswered question set by an audience member at a live incarnation of this podcast back in May 2023, Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted. Back then the in-person audience at The Bothy Vineyard event set us a range of questions to discuss. This one was left anonymously and read  - “Animal welfare in meat production is a good concern but Jacque Cousteau said “who cares about the death throes of a fish?” William broaches the broader implications of trawler fishing, emphasising the discourse encompasses the entirety of animal welfare, extending beyond the act of fishing itself. Stuart reveals the grim realities of trawler fishing, where countless fish meet their demise through suffocation within the nets or endure a chilling fate upon the deck. Such practices cast a shadow of inhumanity over the industry. In a reflective chat, Stuart and William reminisce about William’s childhood angling experiences. They deliberate on the optimal methods to acquaint oneself with the aquatic inhabitants of rivers. William conveys a retrospective wish for a more compassionate approach to learning about fish, a realisation that eluded him in his youth. He affirms his family’s longstanding commitment to minimising their ecological footprint. Stuart contemplates the paradox of nature’s predation, often shunned on television screens, yet an intrinsic element of life. He advocates for a conscious acknowledgment of our predatory role in fishing and urges a thorough consideration of the welfare of the animals we consume, aspiring to the pinnacle of quality in our dietary choices. Expanding upon this, William points out the prevalent focus on mass production in the meat industry, often at the expense of quality. Stuart contends that a holistic understanding is imperative, one that encompasses the entire spectrum of our food production and consumption practices. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheel Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In the context of the podcast medium, it is noteworthy that the co-hosts, Stuart and William, do not preview listener-submitted inquiries prior to the commencement of recording. This practice ensures that their responses remain unpremeditated and genuine, thereby preserving the spontaneity and authenticity of their commentary. So the first listener question is from Teresita, Montevideo, Uruguay - “The Internet isn’t good here sometimes but listen to your new releases on the day you go live when I can. When were the “good old days,” and what were they like for minorities in your country?” The notion of “good old days” is often subject to critical analysis. William suggests that this concept typically aligns with one’s childhood, a period characterised by a lack of awareness of global events. Conversely, Stuart immediately contests the existence of any universally “good old days,” highlighting the historical marginalisation of minority groups. He articulates that the journey towards amplifying marginalised voices is ongoing and fraught with challenges. Stuart and William also touch upon the emergence of new identity categories, reflecting a societal trend towards valuing individuality and uniqueness. They ultimately advocate for an individual-centric approach to identity. Regarding the query posed by Teresita, both Stuart and William acknowledge their limitations in providing a comprehensive response, given that neither identifies as part of a minority group. Bea, from Cornwall, England sets the second question today - “House’s are now seen as assets, not as homes, which is contributing to our unequal society in the UK, especially here in the far south west. Left unchecked this would run and run and really undermine us. The poor are partly kept poor as they seem to work to keep the rich rich. Any thoughts?” Stuart, ever the real estate romantic, believes houses are more than just assets—they’re the stage for our personal soap operas. He’s spotted a trend in the South West: it’s not just the pasties that are hot, but the property prices too, thanks to the ‘seasonal seasoning’ of the area.  Meanwhile, William is all for a population shuffle. He’s convinced that if we all just moved around a bit more, we’d find the perfect balance—like a game of musical chairs, but with postcodes. Stuart’s having an existential moment, pondering how to stop treating houses like giant piggy banks. He’s asking deep questions, like ‘Do you see your home as a sanctuary or a stock option?’ He’s also reminding us that in the grand game of Monopoly, sometimes life flips the board. William’s expanding the asset universe, suggesting we gaze at our dwellings as homes first, investment portfolios second. He’s also musing on society’s pecking order, hinting that breaking free from the family fortune—or misfortune—requires a zen-like approach to life. Just live, he says, and maybe don’t count the bedrooms. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheelsHelp us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon https://bit.ly/3UmtDyr⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Stuart and William are today marking the International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples 2024, with this bonus episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. They ask you to think about what an indigenous person is to you, and whether or not you see yourself as indigenous. Also, they encourage you to always see the person in front of you for who they are, and to keep away from lazy stereotyping, which can easily form barriers. It's hard to demonise someone whom you’ve taken a step towards, whom you’ve gotten to know, and now see as a more complete person whom you are more connected to. You can find out more about this day though the following website: International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Join your co-hosts of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, as they delve into two thought-provoking discussions on stereotypes and superiority, which as always were sparked by questions that listeners have sent in. The first question they delve into is from Yahya, Casablanca-Settat, Morocco - “How do society’s stereotypes influence you personally?” During their discussions they explore the pervasive influence of stereotypes in our daily lives. Stuart emphasises the constant effort required to overcome these preconceived notions, while acknowledging their role in providing predictability, in certain situations. William examines character stereotypes in politics, particularly focusing on right-wing portrayals of immigrants, and discusses how easily anyone can fall into stereotyping people. The hosts then engage in a candid conversation about the most damaging stereotypes in the United Kingdom. The second question they discuss is from Milica, Podgorica, Montenegro - “As you don’t have too many more listener questions lined up, I thought I’d send one in. Who are you superior to yourselves do you think?” Stuart kicks off the second part of the discussion by playfully claiming superiority over William, while William shares his focus on bettering himself, and only uses the comparison of his past self. Stuart elaborates on feeling superior in specific contexts and activities, without considering himself generally superior to others. As the episode concludes, Stuart and William pose a thought-provoking question that ties the discussion back to environmental concerns: "Do you see yourself as being superior to nature?" What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels

Gaby, from Departamento De Santa Cruz, in Bolivia is the lucky listener to set the first of today's questions for your co-host Stuart and William to discuss - “Does the industrial revolution show humanity is punching above its own weight within its own evolution, and causing its own demise?” William’s there, right on this one, and he’s banging on about how the Industrial Revolution’s still going strong. “We’re basically the same as we were 20,000 years ago,” he says, but now we’ve got light bulbs and Wi-Fi. He reckons though we’re all headed for a big ol’ disaster eventually. So, Stuart and William get into it about when this Industrial Revolution malarkey actually kicked off. Stuart feels it’s like someone hit fast-forward on the world. We’re zooming ahead quicker than we can evolve! No wonder we don’t have a clue what we’re doing half the time. Then Stuart gets all deep and meaningful. “Look at your life,” he says. See where you’re punching above your weight, where you’re losing the plot, and where you’re actually on top of things. Once you clock onto that, you can start sorting yourself out. The real trick is knowing that you know, you know? The ultimate awareness is being aware that you are aware. Simon, from Chiselhampton, in Oxfordshire, England, sets the second listener question - “We hear in Oxford there’s a shortage of allotments sites and space for individuals to grow their own crops, especially as new houses are built with smaller gardens. Do you think this is the case or is there plenty of space to grow?”  William notes that the concept of allotments, which gained fresh prominence during the Second World War, remains relevant today. Stuart highlights the potential for guerrilla gardening, also emphasising the plight of elderly community members who, due to physical limitations, can no longer tend to their overgrown gardens. This neglect often leads to feelings of depression and isolation. Conversely, the younger generation frequently faces challenges such as limited garden space or poor soil quality, as modern construction often disregards the importance of fertile soil. Builders often see soil as ‘dirt’ not a living ecosystem. Some youngsters may not have access to a garden at all. Stuart advocates for a community-oriented approach, suggesting that individuals reach out to their neighbours. By offering to cultivate vegetables in their gardens, which can help maintain the space and provide companionship to the garden owners. While there is a shortage of official allotment spaces, there is no lack of potential gardening areas within most communities if we reimagine the whole concept. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Yenifer, from Provincia De Panamá, Panama is the lucky listener setting out the first question for discussion today -  “Are we brainwashed into thinking working hard gets us wherever we want? Is that just a form of enslavement? If we were taught to have a mindset of working smarter, would that impact those trying to keep us in our seats? We’re told to get educated, get better jobs, work harder, yet the hours get longer for little reward”. William posits that the essence of productivity lies in working smarter—an approach that inherently encapsulates working harder by virtue of focused and efficient energy utilisation. Stuart, on the other hand, scrutinises the very notion of hard work, likening it to a form of modern servitude. He argues that the affluent are not the ones toiling; rather, they orchestrate the labour of others. Stuart advocates for self-employment as the epitome of working smartly, challenging the conventional wisdom that equates hard work with success. He contends that employment can sometimes stifle one’s creative vitality. In their dialogue, Stuart and William explore the dynamics of labour and intellect. They deliberate on the distribution of one’s vigour throughout the day and confront the prevailing workplace culture that often expects employees to render uncompensated overtime. William’s resolution is a commitment to discovering methods to enhance efficiency without necessarily increasing effort. Stuart’s resolution is a call to break free from habitual conformity, urging a re-evaluation of one’s work patterns. Abid, Jendouba Governorate, Tunisia sets the second question today - “Should we be focusing on making the world seas and oceans drinkable as a way of counteracting the climate crisis? Empires have been built of lesser concepts. Will that be the next of Earth's assets humanity fights over?” William expresses that the desalination of seawater, while a technological marvel, is an endeavour marked by high energy consumption. He advocates for a more judicious use of existing freshwater reserves as an alternative. Stuart expands by suggesting the extensive use of water in industrial processes such as the production of cement and concrete, as well as in agricultural practices like cattle rearing, locks water away in the processes. He posits that water is poised to become a contentious asset, a catalyst for conflict among human societies. Stuart suggests that the oceans and seas may hold the keys to addressing the climate crisis. However, he cautions that even with advancements rendering desalination more sustainable, the presence of microplastics remains a significant concern. The conversation between William and Stuart underscores the complexity of water management in the context of environmental sustainability and industrial demands. It reflects a broader conversation about the balance between technological progress and ecological stewardship. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Today, we’re again taking a break from our usual format, to give more time and to encourage you, our valued listeners, to send in more questions, for us to explore in future episodes. In this episode, we discuss a question set by an attendee of last year’s iteration of Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, the live incarnation of this podcast. This was a ticketed event, unrecorded, and held in front of a live audience. During the interval of this event we asked attendees to set questions for the panel to discuss in the second half. However, due to the number submitted, we didn’t get around to discussing them all, so we are now slowly working our way through those questions. The question discussed in today’s episode was set by Daryl, and is as follows: “Given human population growth and consumerism is so impactful, should we think about a 1 child policy, like China did, and build our population through immigration?” William discusses the significant environmental impact of having children, due to the resources required to raise them. Stuart notes that only dictatorships can enforce a one-child policy and points out that some places prefer male children. Stuart believes we produce enough food to feed the world, but much of it is used to feed livestock instead of humans, and this livestock feeds a small percentage of us. The conversation then shifts to immigration and the barriers that are often put up. William then brings up advancements in medical science and crop production as drivers of population growth and questions the practicality of enforcing a one-child policy. Stuart brings up the subject of the societal belief of the right to have children and suggests questioning these traditional rites of passage activities. William raises the societal expectation of marriage and children, and Stuart responds by saying it’s okay to choose a different path. The discussion touches on the movement of people and the idea that all humans can trace their ancestry back to two women, highlighting our common heritage. Stuart suggests an action: reflect on your own behaviour, views, and habits regarding family building and rites of passage. William’s action is to see yourself as the sum of your parts and consider the many people we have all descended from. We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Today, we're taking a break from our usual format, to give more time and to encourage you, our valued listeners, to send in more questions for us to explore in future episodes. In this special episode, we revisit a thought-provoking question posed by Peter T. during our Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event in May 2023. This was the ticketed second live iteration of this podcast, in front of an audience. Peter T. asked, "If any human activity is practiced by the majority of people, doesn’t it automatically become unsustainable?" Join Stuart and William as they dive deep into this complex question, examining it from various angles. Stuart begins by asserting that the question is rooted in environmental concerns, specifically focusing on sustainability. He believes that the answer isn't a straightforward yes or no. For instance, if everyone chose to walk instead of drive, this wouldn’t necessarily be environmentally sustainable. Stuart also emphasises that not all widespread activities are inherently detrimental to the environment either. William adds another layer to the discussion, pondering whether the question implies that the sheer volume of participants in any activity could lead to negative environmental impacts. Both hosts agree that rarely is anything categorical in our world, and nuances are crucial. Stuart also reflects on the origin of Peter’s question, suggesting it might stem from a perception that environmentalists want everyone to conform to a single way of living. Listen in for a compelling conversation that challenges the way we think about our everyday actions and their environmental implications. Don’t forget to send in your questions for future episodes! What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not just after numbers. Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Join your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow as they tackle two thought-provoking questions sent in by listeners in this engaging episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. Recorded in Stuart's garden, the duo dive into two intriguing queries that challenge perceptions of nature, society, and personal growth. The first question they tackle is an epic one from Debs in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England, which is as follows: “Humans, at the core, are selfish beings, as proved by many of us willingly locking down during the Covid pandemic, because we wanted to protect ourselves, our loved ones, and our communities. Was nature considered in that? Biodiversity is often lost in many societies and cultures. How on earth do we put it back, or insert it afresh? At the Oxfordshire RSPB Otmoor nature reserve, Marsh Harriers bred for the first time four years ago, and I note there is a pub of the same name in Oxford. The RSPB could have purchased everyone in there a drink to celebrate, but they didn’t. These opportunities are almost always missed. 5000 road names in Oxfordshire, especially in Bicester and Oxford are named after aspects of nature, why isn’t that leveraged to raise awareness? We need to stand in the shoes of nature to really understand the thread. I know of a farmer who stood in the shoes of a dung beetle during an event, and that really helped develop her perspective. We really are a cancer on planet earth, and we really need to add nature's voice to governance. We really need to add more groups including cultural groups to this debate. Yet has anyone asked what aspect of nature these groups care about the most, as a way of understanding how to motivate them to get involved? If a CEO of a business didn’t know this about their client base, they would be sacked. When trying to engage a wider demographic, and broaden it out from white middle aged people, should we be trying to attract them to our events, or getting involved with their events?” In response to Debs' question Stuart and William offer a nuanced perspective on human behaviour and our relationship with nature. Stuart observes that the COVID-19 lockdowns demonstrate our tendency to follow rules and conform, at least initially, while William adds that this behaviour also reveals our inherent selfishness. Stuart points out that nature was largely overlooked during this period, highlighting our disconnect from the natural world. This prompts William to question whether selfishness is uniquely human or a trait shared by other species. The second question they dive into in this episode is from Yenifer from which is as follows: “Can we really be whatever we want to be?” In response to Yenifer's question about personal potential, Stuart and William offer a balanced view on individual aspirations and societal constraints. Stuart cynically notes that our choices are limited by societal structures, mentioning the "old boy's network". William agrees but suggests using positive self-talk to shape our identity and goals. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠ https://bit.ly/45vuCPP, , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://shorturl.at/lsuZM Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://shorturl.at/2Iald

Why do we do this podcast?  We do it to stop the big issues slipping into the shadows. We talk about listener questions as that's what's important to them, and always try to bring it back to the natural world in some way. We have the conversations that need having. It’s not the usual ambience in this episode, as we are back out in Stuart’s courtyard garden again. So expect some interesting background sounds. Shreenika, Western Province, Sri Lanka is the listener tasked with asking the first question.  “How often does ego permeate human consciousness on an individual basis and how damaging is it?” Your co-hosts Stuart and William feel ego is like that one song that gets stuck in your head—permanently permeating human consciousness. But if it’s left uncontrolled, it’s like an annoying earworm that just won’t quit! Removing ego would be like stripping a pizza of its toppings—you’re left with a bland nothing. Ego’s a good tool, but a terrible master. It’s like having a pet tiger: assertive when needed, but you better know when to back off!” Ego’s always there, lurking in the shadows. Like that neighbour who insists on borrowing your lawnmower every weekend.” So, let’s treat ego like a Swiss Army knife—useful, but not the boss. Be aware of its role, wield it wisely, and don’t let it take over the show! Yusuf, Kocaeli, Turkey asks the second listener question  “Are we overly obsessed with what day of the week it is, or is that another example of how we categorise things. This time, time itself?” William believes we’re overly obsessed with what day of the week it is. He particularly likes the saying “it does feel like a Monday today”, yet,  what is a Monday actually meant to feel like? Stuart has worked a lot on his own over the years, and he always mixed up his working week schedule as he didn’t want to feel that he was on a treadmill. When he had staff, he found they struggled with that unpredictability. Stuart feels we are obsessed with categorising. This can be damaging. This can be a barrier to quick adaptation. William feels that the week comes from the structure of schooling, and on the topic of working hours, there are times we are extremely productive, and times we aren’t, but we still need to sit at our desk till our allotted time is done. For what conceivable reason would any employer or employee want to engage in such an activity when looking at the bigger picture? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

No waffle in this episode, we get straight into the listener questions, the first of which today is from Tess, in Stranrear, Scotland - “How damaging do you feel dismissing someone's opinion that you don’t like can be?” Stuart emphasises that dismissing someone’s opinion is detrimental, limiting both yourself and the person you’re conversing with. Active listening fosters better understanding. He encourages us to listen to everyone and be open to challenging their and our own viewpoints. William agrees, highlighting the danger of stereotyping. Forming quick judgments prevents us from truly hearing others. He notes that people may avoid listening out of fear they’ll agree. Stuart warns against falling into this habitual trap. Tom, from Eastney, Portsmouth, England asks todays second question - “Wildlife campaigners are claiming huge amounts of countryside has been unnecessarily lost after the HS2 fast rail link was classed by a watchdog as, “unachievable”. The Infrastructure And Projects Authority (IPA) has given the programme a ‘red’ rating. After analysing plans for the construction of the first two phases from London to Birmingham and then onto Crewe in Cheshire, the official infrastructure watchdog, said in its view the project was undeliverable, in its current form. Estelle Bailey the Chief Executive of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust said “The vast project has been mismanaged from the start. It's taken a wrecking ball to nature”. In February 2023 the Wildlife Trusts claimed HS2 Limited “Made fundamental flaws in the way it assessed the value of nature along the construction path”. Estelle Bailey said further “It made huge errors in its calculations, undervaluing natural habitats and over-valuing the impacts of its compensation measure. If the project is abandoned then huge amounts of nature will have been lost, for nothing. We need to learn from this debacle. We’re living through a climate crisis and we can’t afford to make these costly mistakes”. Chap’s, what are your thoughts on this? I know you’ve done numerous episodes on HS2 as I’ve been quietly listening for a number of years now, but please revisit. Thanks”. William criticises the management of the HS2 project, considering it a debacle. Despite being pro-HS2 due to the outdated Victorian-era rail routes, he acknowledges the mismanagement. Even though nature is always impacted by big projects, stopping the project now would mean nature’s loss has been potentially in vain, especially during the climate crisis. William emphasises the need for caution, recognizing human fallibility. He also highlights the overcrowded trains and the necessity of an improved rail system to reduce car usage. Stuart questions whether HS2 is permanently unachievable and whether large projects can avoid harming nature. He suggests that a point system valuing nature in these project might be impractical. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Trigger Warning: This episode covers the sensitive topics of euthanasia and death. Listener discretion is strongly advised. On this thought-provoking episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle two profound questions from listeners in Scotland. First up, Tess from Stranraer asks the following: “Is the time now right in the UK for assisted dying, assisted suicide or assisted Euthanasia, whatever you want to call it, to be legalised? Some of the public seem to want it, when some people working in palliative nursing still don’t. So who is right? Should it just be for people close to death to relieve pain and suffering, when the alternative to assisted dying means more pain and suffering in the lead up to certain death? Do you think we need to improve the palliative care that's available to avoid this, or pursue assisted dying for certain types, on a case by case basis? If so, who moderates that as you often say on this podcast?” Stuart believes it should be legalised on a case-by-case basis, but not institutionalised, expressing concern that legislation could turn it into a bureaucratic "tick box exercise". William explores how death remains an uncomfortable topic in Western cultures, fraught with intense emotions, even around unassisted passing. Both hosts agree euthanasia is a complex issue without clear answers, so society must continue discussing openly. Then, Tommy from Alloa in Scotland poses the next question for discussion: “You talk about thinking 8 generations forward and back. With that in mind, are we doing the right stuff right now for the generations to follow when considering the climate crisis we indisputably face?” Stuart brings up the fact that merely recognizing the impact on those eight generations is a good start. William advocates learning from the past about what we did well and poorly, while avoiding rushed construction that fails to fully consider long-term ramifications. Both Stuart and William challenge listeners to embrace "intergenerational thinking" in all their endeavours, looking beyond short political cycles, and more towards lasting positive change. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In their signature unvarnished style, your co-hosts, Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow aren't afraid to push boundaries, and explore taboo subjects often left undiscussed. Prepare to have your assumptions challenged, as these two plumb the depths of protests and trigger warnings, from refreshingly candid angles. First up, Stuart and William dive into the nature of protests, which was prompted by the following question from listener Imelda in Pichincha, Ecuador - “Does effective protest have to be disruptive and noisy?” Stuart ponders if art can be a form of protest, while William wonders aloud what even constitutes a true "protest". From silent sit-ins to raucous street marches, they explore the many faces of activist expression. Next it's on to the prickly topic of trigger warnings, where your co-hosts are triggered into the conversation by the following listener question, which came from Layla in Bahrain - “Are trigger warnings really needed? I know they are good for strobe lights etc that can have physical impacts, but let's focus on things like Shakespere plays, where we half expect to see scenes of violence. It can have more impact if we’re not fully expecting it. Should TW’s be on podcasts like yours, because I worry about the potential learning by the listener being exposed to such material, is watered down because we might be pussy footing around people's feelings too much? It's vital we get the balance around this right, but where is that balance, and who dictates where that is? Balance means different things in different countries too”. Stuart argues some trigger warnings are necessary (like seizure warnings), but that we risk being overly cautious. William raises the example of film ratings providing upfront content advisories. But is there value in experiencing art's shocks and surprises organically and unexpectedly? The pair debate whether ubiquitous trigger warnings diminish their purpose and cause us to live lives of avoidance, or if they are simply a necessity in our hyper-connected age. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice, and we like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside The fundraiser to get Stuart back out into nature with an all-terrain chair is also mentioned again today, and you can donate here ⁠https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=20240518_⁠

Charlie, from Montrose, Scotland has sent in this listener question  - “Who owns land is at the heart of the housing crisis in the UK. It's not because bricks and mortar have suddenly become incredibly expensive. It's because the value of land has gone through the roof. Is it possible to own land though when we as humans came from it, are part of it, and ultimately, will go back to it?” Stuart feels that land ownership is all an illusion and the concept of land ownership has been going on for centuries. Indigenous cultures ask the question, how can you own yourself? Stuart contests Charlie’s question, exploring that isn’t the way that we disperse our population, and how we use and repurpose the buildings we already have, really at the heart of this matter? Stuart’s action is for you to stand back and look at your life, and ask yourself do you really own anything? William sees land ownership, in the UK, as a form of control. You get to dictate who is allowed on your land. He contrasts this with what happens in Finland which has the right to roam. He believes that land ownership is just a piece of paper that states you do. He further explores how there can often be issues with legacy that leaves housing empty. William’s action is to put some pressure on politicians for how we use existing buildings that can be easily utilised as housing, but currently aren’t. He goes on to want people not to get onto the property ladder just because you feel you should, just to keep up. Gary, from Stirling, Scotland asks the second question - “Can you guys recommend any books that are worth reading?” Stuart recommends  The Bible,  The Hidden Life of Trees by Peter Wohlleben.  https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/The-Hidden-Life-of-Trees-by-Peter-Wohlleben-author-Jane-Billinghurst-translator/9780008218430 William recommends  Notes On A Nervous Planet by Matt Haig. https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Notes-on-a-Nervous-Planet-by-Matt-Haig/9781786892690 Bulletproof by Chantal by Chantal Burns. https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Bulletproof-by-Chantal-Burns/9781292330020 William’s action is to become a member of your local library as it is an amazing resource. It’s good for you, and it is good for the library, as they often offer lots of other really useful services. The fundraiser to get Stuart back out into nature with an all-terrain chair is also mentioned again today, and you can donate here https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=20240518_  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Mariama, a listener from Sierra Leone has sent this question in for discussion on today's episode - “For a few years I lived in Cumbria in the UK, and miss your country walks there. Countryside here in Sierra Leone is a very different thing though. Tell me, what frustrates you guys the most about the countryside in the UK?” The biggest thing that frustrates Stuart are gates that block access to green spaces for certain disabilities, and that some gates are accessible to some wheelchairs and not others. Though he’s also frustrated that people generally stick to the well beaten track and how we’re obsessed with how the hedgehog is decline in the UK, yet there are other animals that are in more imminent danger. Stuart’s action is to open your eyes and ears when you’re out in nature, and to put your damn phones down! William’s biggest issue with access to the countryside is that if it’s private land, the king and his castle attitude pervades. He also sees people following a habit about where they go in the countryside, going to the same places as everyone else. Not off the beaten track. He talks about the habits we take into the countryside that don’t need to be there, such as being on your phone, and not being mindful of your surroundings. William’s action is to think about why you go out into nature. The fundraiser to get Stuart back out into nature with an all-terrain chair is mentioned, and you can donate here https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=20240518_  Tommy, from Alloa, Scotland has set this second question today -  “Concealing wealth is part and parcel of preserving it. Are the wealthy really as insecure as it would seem to me?” Stuart asks how we can truly know whether someone is insecure, and brings up how those who win the lottery often conceal they’ve done so, but is that down to insecurity?  William carries this thought on, that it’s often a good idea to conceal a big win as people suddenly crawl out of the woodwork, and ask for money. Stuart talks about those who are born into wealth and the idea of hiding what someone is investing is as a way of concealing things, but again is that down to insecurity? He doesn’t know what Tommy’s angle is as he isn’t sat with them, he does however get the impression that Tommy’s banging the wealthy over the head for being wealthy. Stuart raises that maybe those with wealth can be petrified of losing their wealth, and ends up by throwing a question back at Tommy: So what if people are concealing their wealth?  William wonders whether wealth is concealed as a way to avoid taxes? Stating that the best way to use your own wealth is not to feel you need to show it off, and that those who show their wealth are potentially more insecure. He also feels it doesn’t mean that if someone is concealing their wealth they are insecure either, they maybe just don’t want to flaunt it. He further brings up that even if they had a wealthy person in the room with them, they wouldn’t necessarily be indicative of everyone with wealth.  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In this short episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow reflect on reaching the impressive 500 episode mark for this podcast. The big question on everyone's mind - will they make it to the ultra-rare 1,000 episode club? Stuart is bullish on the prospect, believing if they keep up their well-oiled podcast production process, the 1,000 episode milestone will come along naturally. William, ever the pragmatist, prefers to focus just on creating the next great episode, rather than thinking too far ahead. While reaching 1,000 episodes would certainly be a unique achievement in the podcasting world, the hosts agree that arbitrary numbers aren't their main motivation. As William states, he has no desire to simply "pootle along" chasing a number. For Stuart and William, the real drive is continuing to engage their audience with entertaining, insightful content, episode after episode. Still, they can't help but revel in the 500 episode landmark as a testament to their longevity and consistency in the podcasting game. Listen in for this celebratory episode as the hosts look back on their podcast journey so far, whilst pondering what the future may hold. Wherever they end up, you can be sure every episode will be a wild ride! We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

As 2024 unfolds before us, your co-hosts William and Stuart embark on a discussion about the year ahead. They talk about the future of the podcast, and how they currently have listener questions lined up and in the kitty, and what would happen if that supply would one day run out. Stuart delves into how the fundraiser for the Extreme 8 is his biggest personal focus. Throughout this bonus episode they together navigate the dynamics of their partnership, balancing immediate priorities with long-term aspirations. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like discussed on this podcast? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comHelp us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Ah, the sweet serenade of the dawn chorus! When was the last time you really listened to the birds singing, particularly in the morning?  Well today Stuart and William are highlighting that it’s International Dawn Chorus Day. The release time of this bonus episode is 5am, which is the perfect time to get out and listen to nature's greatest symphony.  And there you have it! Stuart and William, embracing the early morning madness of the feathered talent show. Remember, folks, it’s not just about hearing the birds; it’s about really listening to their feathered ballads. Happy International Dawn Chorus Day!  (Disclaimer: No actual birds were harmed in the making of this podcast). You can find out more about this day with the following links: wildlifetrusts.org/dawn-chorus-day rspb.org.uk/the-dawn-chorus-all-you-need-to-know-about-natures-big-show What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside